Yes, but 100% of those are the same ones who would do a volunteer year
Discussion
No. The whole point is that you have just a few soldiers, so you need mandatory service. For example if we had not Turkyie next to us with 70 million more population thsn us, we wouldn't have that. Same for the israeli occupation forces. Without conscripts they can not guard something more than their barraks. That is all...
I understand the problem, I just don't believe conscription fixes it.
The unpaid and unmotivated do not learn efficiently, and then get completely rekt in war.
But they let the government pretend its doing something, and also function as hostages in any domestic political crisis.
Britain, during the 1930s, had classes at highschool on weapons handling and basic fieldcraft. That would be my preferred model of compulsory service, by far.
Yeah it is that too in a way but think of this: conscripts can cover succesfully positions such as cookers, supplies, transports and of course guarding etc. So they release a significant number of fighting troops from other duties. Not all are fighting. A big number does not fight