Your evidence is based on statistics, which are easily manipulated, whereas my evidence comes from the very real experience of my family. In other words, my ideas are based on real experience rather than questionable data, and I'll take experience over data any day of the week. Anyway, what do you care? Just go and have as many vaccines as you think advisable (if there is a limit) and smile and enjoy life while you still can
Discussion
I'm not here for you. You'll never change your mind. I'm here for people who might read your inability to spot that someone might have more than 1 health issue and not immediately spot it themselves.
Your relative also took a piss before they died. Better start retaining your urine now, peeing kills you. See how dumb that reasoning looks when we swap a few words?
I don't know what killed your relative. I do know the health risks of statins and how to prevent them, which most doctors won't recommend and most patients won't comply with anyway. (Take coq10 or better yet ubiquinol and exercise) I do know a logical fallacy when I see one. I do know that with the number of people prescribed statins lots of people on statins are going to die for all sort of reasons just because it is a huge number of people on them.
I made a very narrow proclamation about a single vaccine saving millions of lives. The facts support me. You are just moving the goal posts around after I scored to continue living in denial.
Your team set the rules to a single case of vaccines benefiting humanity means they lost, not me.
Thanks, Bill! If another relative takes statins and develops cancer, I will pass on your medical expertise.
Dude, that is the stupidest possible conclusion you could have arrived at based on what I said.
200 million people on statins. Out of a population that size some will get completely unrelated cancer. Only someone who is willfully ignorant of statistics will insist they must be related.