Why would divided mean conquered? I guess given the times I need to change my profile picture from the marker of an ancestor with the same name killed during the French and Indian War to the ancestor with the same name that died in the 5th South Carolina Cavalry in 1864.

The federal government may have conquered the states attempting to leave last time. This time that would be after 50 years of deficit spending and 30 years of policing the world with a population less and less willing to die for some rich politician. I don’t think enough people have the stomach to force people to stay in and the government probably can’t afford to pay them to do it at this point. No one has the capacity to invade. Not even us if there were two continents this size with as many privately owned weapons and the same population. Even split into 2-3 countries.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Divided we fall. Maybe I should have put divided and vulnerable instead of divided and conquered, but it’s getting at the same idea.

No one would have to invade, the beast would have slayed itself, the giant would crumble under its own weight, and I’m not going to pretend like I have a crystal ball, but I imagine it will cause a huge vacuum when it comes to global power dynamics.

Only thing I’m certain of is I’ll be stacking sats the entire time and posting on nostr making new friends and zapping old ones😎🧘‍♂️

I think all that’s happening anyway once we hit a certain point on the national debt and deficit. As far as a global power vacuum goes, this might be selfish of me but at this point I’m just worried about the 25 mile radius that is the corner of it that my family has been in for three centuries and will be in for another 300. Especially if worrying about the rest of it puts us at risk because of blow back and financial instability from the imperial infrastructure that has to he funded for that purpose.

Fair point, just because it ends doesn’t mean we do