Replying to Avatar reis

Thank you for the clarification. If it’s not worse in terms of security, I think it’s worth considering as a possible implementation.

nostr:npub1xtscya34g58tk0z605fvr788k263gsu6cy9x0mhnm87echrgufzsevkk5s nostr:npub1gcxzte5zlkncx26j68ez60fzkvtkm9e0vrwdcvsjakxf9mu9qewqlfnj5z what do you think?

Avatar
Vitor Pamplona 6mo ago

Signer should be separate. Clients are too insecure to hold keys.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Avatar
reis 6mo ago

Are you saying that the own shard in nshard should be eliminated in this example? Aside from that, does the rest make sense?

Avatar
Vitor Pamplona 6mo ago

No, just the coordinator should be one of the signers.