They just shift the goal posts and reset the clock and act like nothing happened.
Discussion
A broken clock is right twice a day.
How often is a broken hypothesis, held together by politically driven data models that are artificially protected from scrutiny by academic circle-jerking and cherry picked funding of studies, and a media that refuses to allow criticism of said broken hypothesis, correct?
Twice a day ?
Mate I’m way too tired to even read that let alone respond
It's rhetorical , no worries.
😂😂😂
To be clear , I believe in environmentalism, but it is undoubtedly being abused.
Responsible stewardship is the way. Government ran schemes begin flawed, cause damage, and end with blaming the landowner. No responsibility taken.
Same with anything else governments touch as well. Come up with a terrible idea that a majority of idiots think sounds good/feels good, milk the sentiment/resources dry, and walk away while pointing at others as the cause of the failure.
Rinse and repeat.
Fucking saving this note, such a succinct description of the low time preference, fiat , statist bullshit that we've been enduring for so long. Mhaith thú!