NUCLEAR IS DEAD.

Yesterday, I read about Google planning to build 6 small modular nuclear reactors by 2030 to bring on 0.5 GW of energy.

According to Llama, the approximate number of nuclear reactors in the top 5 countries is:

United States: 93 operational reactors

France: 58 operational reactors

China: 53 operational reactors

Japan: 33 operational reactors

Russia: 32 operational reactors

Roughly, a nuclear reactor generates 1 GW of energy.

According to IRENA, last year, approximately 350 GW of solar capacity was added - more than all those reactors combined.

The equivalent of 350 nuclear power plants added in just one year.

I understand the arguments about needing baseload power, as opposed to solar's intermittent power; however, I have to think that given the magnitude of solar capacity being added and its exponential growth, even with outdated battery technology, solar will swamp nuclear.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

🎯

Most people don’t get this.

Check out the work at Rethinkx.com

They make a very good case (based on cost curves) that the (relatively immediate) future will be 90 percent solar plus batteries.