Another sufferer of the podcast I see, “this is the problem, people not the experts talking like they are” while also…not being an expert, ironic🤦🏾‍♂️

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

it was so bad. that made me wildly change my mind about him.

dave smith sounded more grounded & reasonable to me.

Yes definitely. Haven’t finished it all the way through, but they shut that shit down early. I don’t understand how he could claim there’s no skewed narrative around the conflict when a. He’s literally acting (unconsciously or not) as a gatekeeper of their version of truth, b. It’s genuinely laughable to compare any resistance to the part the zionists play in that region. ceasefires don’t matter to them, civilians/infrastructure don’t matter to them, the Arab people and nations which surround them don’t matter(god forbid you coexist), medics don’t matter to them, CHILDREN, don’t matter to them, they can justify it away no matter what. But awww I didn’t hear enough propaganda from your side? We should platform more incorruptible people unwilling to show any sort of restraint or empathy? Hmmm, why are we in this situation in the first place, let’s not ask the hard questions people don’t want others finding the answer to🤫 if you do, official title, “conspiracy theorist” Yk, for bringing up established facts and using critical thinking, but we’re crazy, rightt!

i didn’t get to finish it either. i think he’s become the victim of the algorithm he spoke of himself. picking up excerpts or short forms of people’s narratives & assuming they’re trying to change history? like, wow! is he new or something? taking opinions for facts or conspiracy. he assumes he’s smarter than everyone around him but falls for 15 second clips of a podcaster’s opinion about churchill. lol

what did i expect, he’s a product of the mainstream media that has lost credibility. he thinks it’s everyone else’s fault because they have wrong opinions & his is the only correct one.

Well saidd, I saw a clip somewhere on a guy talking about how in journalism and commentary, they sort of condition you to believe that as a part of the 4th establishment or wtv, you’re somehow above bias and prejudice leaking into the truth… true objectiveness we can all agree no one possessing, and yet that absolute faith and confidence in the establishment and in certain sources that they get information from is somehow overlooked. It’s sets a bad precedent when you think you’re the smartest person in EVERY room you walk into, and that’s def the energy you see.