Lol
Discussion
That doesn't mean it isn't true, just that I didn't bother referring to any data because it seems like an obvious pattern.
I know. It doesn't mean it isn't true, but it also doesn't mean that it's true. 🤷
Providing a source also wouldn't mean that it's true. It would just make it more convincing.
"More convincing" is better than "less convincing"
The original post is actually quite convincing, but would be good to see some data/source. Often things that sound reasonable are bs
Yes, but running the numbers requires work.
That would depend upon the audience. Sometimes a statement is merely there to acknowledge something generally acknowledged to be true, so that nobody needs to be convinced.