On my side, it's mostly because I don’t use their hardware or software. So even if I hacked together a quick package to make Haven users happy, I wouldn’t be eating my own dog food in terms of maintenance and support. So I'd rather not do it myself. I don’t know if nostr:nprofile1qqsw9n8heusyq0el9f99tveg7r0rhcu9tznatuekxt764m78ymqu36cpr3mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujucnfw33k76twwpshy6ewvdhk6tcpzdmhxue69uhhwmm59e6hg7r09ehkuef0qy2hwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtn4w3ux7tn0dejj7ne6u4e uses any of this himself, or if anyone else is willing to take on the maintenance beyond hacking together a one-off package. I'm… not 😅.

I’ve seen some discussion from folks about creating Haven packages for these ecosystems, similar to the many Docker / Podman / OCI community releases out there. Not sure if anything concrete ever materialised out of it. One way or another, this is a good way to go about it. Assuming there’s a good, well-maintained community wrapper with at least one maintainer willing to put in the work, I’ve got nothing against integrating it upstream on my side.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

No replies yet.