This thinking seems similar to suggesting that liking seatbelts because they make you feel more snug is a better reason to use them than their statistical likelihood of reducing your risk of death in a car crash.
Discussion
It's a fallacy of false analogy to compare belts and humans ignoring that the latter are biopsychosocial beings... but there will be those who will buy that answer and it will be respected
I was merely producing a hypothetical comparison of a human opinion. The entities weren't particularly important. Essentially you believe it is ok for me to be prejudiced as long as it's irrational. I guess then you get to look down on me.
It is VERY important the entities, analyze it later in other days with more calm… I never said what you say
I always said that against these circumstances I can do nothing more… I cannot force you to believe the same as me… that I give up does not mean that I support it
The seems similar to suggesting that liking seatbelts because they make you feel more snug is a better reason to use them than their statistical likelihood of reducing your risk of death in a car crash.
Your first post ended with "change my mind" implying you were inviting discussion.
When I provided evidence that other population groups are engaging in elevated interracial violence you suggested that using probability wasn't individualistic enough but if I am simply prejudiced then that is to be respected.
The entities weren't important to my argument.
Me rn (right now):
