🤖 Tracking strings detected and removed!
🔗 Clean URL(s):
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=d8IZ0L5596s
❌ Removed parts:
&pp=ygUZR09EIGlzIHJlYWxpdHkgaGlnaGVzdCBpcQ%3D%3D
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=d8IZ0L5596s&pp=ygUZR09EIGlzIHJlYWxpdHkgaGlnaGVzdCBpcQ%3D%3D
Truth isn't an idea, it's a being
Discussion
Damn, I was so impressed, was like "I THOUGHT OF THAT IN DEVELOPING MY PHILOSOPHY!" until he lost me at 10:10 in. Wtf do you mean we determine reality but a table doesn't, somehow? Idiot. We have more power than a table in ways crucial to our understanding, to what we concern ourselves with, but uncertainty is not resolved solely from the actions of a human being exclusive of a table. The identity process, the logical process, happens across all the stuff, as he himself said. It's a consensus mechanism, and as humans the easiest way for us to see this kind of mechanism happening is the market, wherein information is transferred and general consensuses are formed, but each individual element in the network may deviate from the consensus or add to this locality its own choices.
Don't make the cross into idealism. That shit's deadly. Idealism fails to recognize that it doesn't have the whole picture. It assumes ALL when SOME is all that is known. That is a fallacy.
The rest of the ideas here presented are quite cool and actually mesh with or even are identical to my own philosophy. He just misses the consensus formation in absence of people part and the respecting the fact that our framework of understanding things, our lens, may be the thing determining the truth of a statement in a way meaningful only in so much as that language or framework applies coherently. It does not change the meaning within another framework by the magic of words or percepts.
