I think the pressure will mount as more and more people become suspicious. This will either force Saylor to provide the very easy proof, or force him to double down on the lies which will become more and more obvious as time goes on.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Do you know much about saylors past? I'm ignorant, but I'd heard back in the day when his stock crashed spectacularly, there may have been mutterings of foul play. Can't recall any details though

Yes, he has been dishonest in the past.

Tax evasion in 2022, he paid a $40M fine in 2024.

And exaggerated earnings in his companies filings in 2000. He was sued by the SEC for this one and settled with an undisclosed sum along with assurances not to do this again.

More signal.

Interesting. If you're right, this is gonna be very fun to see play out (price aside 🥲).

Legal caveat!

I'm neither right nor wrong, all I'm saying is I don't know 😂

so saylor turns out to be the next SBF, rugs half the internet, bitcoin crashes a bit for a year, everyone learns from their mistakes, we pump again and we all self custody happily ever after

That is the extrapolation of past events I think about. But does it have to come with a crash? So paper bitcoins get rugged, shouldn't our real ones then go up in value. Grrr

Dump on the news, pump on the value.

Oddly that made it click

it’d be cool if it makes nothing more than a tiny whimper, but I imagine a microstrategy earthquake being pretty similar to FTX because of relative size