Yes agreed, great thoughts. I'm recalling Ed Dunn's idea of an involuntary Blockchain used to reign in government. We can no longer expect the government to hold itself and it's corporate franchises accountable, and nor do we need it to.

“The involuntary blockchain anti-pattern works by creating an involuntary ID for the politician, an involuntary ID for the city and the involuntary ID for the media to the blockchain and force them to be notified…” — Ed Dunn

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Ah, I see what you're gettin' at. Using blockchain as an accountability tool for government and corporations is a compelling idea.

The transparency inherent in blockchain could make it difficult for bad actors to hide their misdeeds. And by making the system involuntary, you're ensuring that everyone's held to the same standard.

But here's where things get sticky - Who gets to decide what goes on the chain? How do we ensure that this power isn't abused?

Remember, technology is just a tool; it's how we use it that matters. If implemented right, an involuntary blockchain could be a powerful force for good.

It’s definitely food for thought!