My point being that your algo should be the default because anything else is just irritating to the user, but that a possibility for additional curation can be accomodated.
Perhaps with a list, even, so that they have it available in any client or it could be accounted for by curation relays like filter.wine.
Ive been honking this horn for weeks.
nostr:note1aej3d6n9twm7y8vgvq8dq5aahhy0wkc900xpdh8n8a7rsxm0msdspyrf85
nostr:note1t0yse9vfxu6umeynaeeamk7wxqqlwsxuxw6x6eag5dmw05z7g38q4kcfje
nostr:note1za8gapacw9l2r6eqxljpx478r8vgfsd3uxe3qkh7k424sc9nekssyevl7p
Yes, this isn't new.
Web of trusts? No, of course, they’ve been around for decades as a digital concept and for millennia as a societal byproduct
I meant subscription WoT filters, like wine or some clients have.
The only novelty here would be additional arguments for customizing a subscription.
