Wow. I just read the other 35 comments answering Lynâs question. In a nut shell, this âfreedom techâ focused cohort (Nostr) agrees with nearly perfect homogeneity that in 20 years we will live in a dystopian world of monetary and communication centralisation.
đ¤Żđ˘
Why would they even bother with Bitcoin, I wonder outloud? đ¤¨
nostr:nevent1qqsx08qqv7def7w94k2qen8lmydk6ywmzmkpsh4gsw7l7ljn3w7zmng8ea8y3
Is BTC even decentralized if itâs 100% transaction traceable?
If it hasnât dismantled the control apparatus of âthe stateâ then no, it wonât be truly decentralised and it will fail even as a SoV. Let alone, MoE.
The 2 systems are diametrically opposed. One MUST outcompete the other out of existence.
It just shocks me that so many here view these centralising forces as permanent/immutable.
Completely antithetical to the âwe are winningâ meme.
Yes. Decentralized, secure, uncensorable, and private are all unique traits. Bitcoin on the main layer is optimized for the 1st three without concern for private. Privacy can be implemented on higher layers.
Higher layers donât currently exist.
Iâm in the bitcoin massively removes bad incentives and government becomes more responsive to the people it serves in the next 20yrs.
