Replying to Avatar Michael Matulef

My philosophy is based on the principle of self-ownership. You own your life. To deny this is to imply that another person has a higher claim on your life than you do. No other person, or group of persons, owns your life nor do you own the lives of others.

https://video.nostr.build/87003c81bd1276fa2b3ce7d4819b8a3fa92811ca3af7a505e6dc26d48fd206ef.mp4#m=video%2Fmp4&dim=720x720&blurhash=UN9QqOkEN%25a%23OLofs%3Aa%24XBjYsQWUV%40WAWUj%3F&x=d257a65d8c7a29ed13fe6ee084a83d4c4e0df12460a0b21c42e617df7e93569b

Avatar
Rich Nost 2y ago

If I run into a burning building that I did not have permission to enter, and I rescue an occupant, did I violate the property owner's rights? What if I hesitated, because I was tErRifIEd oF viOLatInG tHe NAP?

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

b2
Monkey Pox Denier 2y ago

This is theoretically bullshit.

Normally there are more circumstances like just NAP. Do you know the owner? It's he your neighbor? How acted people in the past? What happened to them?

You wouldn't run today simply into a secured military area either, but you wouldn't hesitate to help at a burning house, even in a state that permits to shoot you for trespassing.

Avatar
Sovran Systems 2y ago

Violation of Natural Law incurs karmic debt upon the violator. Saving someone's life that indeed needed immediate help carries with it more positive karmic debt then trespassing (which also violates Natural Law).