Most users will expect to use the @ format especially when tagging users, simply because that’s what 10+ years of social media have taught us.

I think Damus must do the first two things you suggested, but with a bare identifier it adds nostr: automatically. In these screenshots I used the naddr provided by Habla and the noteID provided by Damus for the same article (Will’s nostrdb article). In the first test Damus added nostr: automatically to the naddr, but didn’t render a preview or link. In the other 2 tests I used the note ID format with and without the @ and in both cases it rendered a preview. The Nostur client doesn’t render a preview for naddr, but it does make it clickable and opens the corresponding article in the client, which I think is at least an acceptable fallback.

Just makes sense from a user side that if you tag someone or a note in your client, people in other clients will be able to see who/what you tagged.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

I absolutely agree with all your critisims about Nostr and we will address all of them in Blowater at least for the DM part. We will be there.

Nice! I will check Blowater out 🤙 And thank you for the zap! 💜 It doesn’t show on the note for some reason, I think maybe because I switched my receiving wallet recently. The sats went to my old wallet, but just letting you know I did receive them. Nostur shows it as an “unverified zap” which happens when I’ve changed wallets. Maybe that’s another thing clients should do, double check that it’s sending to the wallet in the user’s profile 😅 🤣

The core problem is that profiles is not updated in time on most clients so that I still had your old profile.

Ah, I see. makes sense