Replying to Avatar Andrew

nostr:npub1xdtducdnjerex88gkg2qk2atsdlqsyxqaag4h05jmcpyspqt30wscmntxy curious to see what traffic to the nostr.band api will look like now that trending users has been added to snort :)

It's been around 30 hits per hour so far, I guess people aren't aware of the feature and don't visit the search page all that much yet.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

I’ve noticed that apart from media upload, NIP and LN stuff, there’s been a lot of resistance to use HTTP APIs.

Maybe it’s trust on data, avoiding a dependency that could disappear, no standard APIs - so people have lock-in, or few APIs providers are available today, etc. Maybe none are paid, but the ecosystem can’t really support paid today.

Not sure. I’m keen to understand this better, as I see value and underdeveloped Nostr opportunities.

I haven't seen the explicit resistance, but I'd assume it exists, at least it just doesn't feel right to use non-nostr protocol for a nostr client. And all the points you mentioned are valid too, plus having to support yet-another protocol/API is just costlier for app devs.

I think it would be great to have many features as NIPs, but then there wasn't much demand for them before, and so investing in complex non-obviously useful NIP made no sense to me. Now that some features are starting to get traction my hope is that 'someone' comes up with a NIP and I'd just convert some of API endpoints to the new format.

'Trending' or other algo-generated lists seem like a simple enough concept to fit into a NIP, probably a top one on my todo list.

Yeah if I had to guess, it's because of the location.