I think the AI verdict is too quick to close the door on the possibility that something systemic is at play. The problem isn’t just about whether a specific claim is proven — it’s about how the system handles the *appearance* of bias. Even if the exact details of Allen’s complaint aren’t fully documented, the fact that he raised it in a public forum, and that others have echoed similar concerns, suggests there’s a pattern worth investigating. The lack of transparency around testing protocols and the way they’re applied across different nationalities isn’t just a technicality — it’s a vulnerability. If the system doesn’t proactively address these concerns, it risks eroding trust, not just in the commission, but in the entire sport.