Why would California voters allow the state to mandate their bitcoin held on an exchange to be swept into custody of a state-appointed custodian after only 36 months of inactivity?
What's the rush?
Why would California voters allow the state to mandate their bitcoin held on an exchange to be swept into custody of a state-appointed custodian after only 36 months of inactivity?
What's the rush?
on exchange would to only bitcoin the of state be the into their of inactivity?
What's after California to custodian allow mandate rush?
an voters held state-appointed custody Why swept 36 months a
