I like the lyrics. Since YouTube is being a butt I just imagined it was Rammstein playing it.
It could mean a lot if things, but the last part makes me think of Osiris' dead body being the world. Being simultaneously evil and God, which isn't the same as saying God is evil, is quite gnostic. They didn't say it, but I'll fill it in - the serpent in the garden is Jesus. Not all gnostics would agree.
Anyways, I hope I can that to play.
ɴᴏ, ɪ ᴅɪꜱᴀɢʀᴇᴇ ᴛʜᴇʀᴇ ɪꜱ ɪᴅᴇɴᴛɪᴛʏ ʙᴇᴛᴡᴇᴇɴ ᴛʜᴇ ꜱᴇʀᴘᴇɴᴛ (ᴡʜᴏ ʙʏ ᴛʜᴇ ᴡᴀʏ ɪꜱ ʟᴏɴɢ ᴅᴇᴀᴅ) ᴀɴᴅ ᴊᴇꜱᴜꜱ (ᴡʜᴏ ᴘʀᴏʙᴀʙʟʏ ɪꜱ ꜱᴛɪʟʟ ᴛʜᴇ ᴋɪɴɢ ᴏꜰ ᴛʜᴇ ᴀɴɢᴇʟꜱ).
ɪᴛ'ꜱ ʀᴇꜰᴇʀʀɪɴɢ ᴛᴏ ᴏᴜʀ ᴘᴏᴛᴇɴᴛɪᴀʟ, ᴡʜɪᴄʜ ᴡᴀʏ ᴡᴇꜱᴛᴇʀɴ ᴍᴀɴ? ᴛᴏ ᴍᴀʀxɪꜱᴛ ʜᴇʟʟ ᴀɴᴅ ɪɴᴄɪɴᴇʀᴀᴛɪᴏɴ ᴀɴᴅ ᴅᴇᴄᴀʏ ᴀɴᴅ ᴅᴇᴄᴀᴅᴇɴᴄᴇ, ᴏʀ ᴛᴏ ᴘᴜʀɪᴛʏ, ᴀꜱᴄᴇɴꜱɪᴏɴ ᴀɴᴅ ʟɪꜰᴇ ᴀꜱ ᴀ ꜱᴘᴀᴄᴇ ꜰᴀʀɪɴɢ ᴘɪᴏɴᴇᴇʀ.
ɪ ᴀᴍ ǫᴜɪᴛᴇ ᴄᴇʀᴛᴀɪɴ ᴛʜᴀᴛ ᴛʜᴇ ᴍᴀɴ ᴡʜᴏ ᴡᴀꜱ ᴛʜᴇ ꜱᴇʀᴘᴇɴᴛ ɪꜱ ʟᴏɴɢ ᴅᴇᴀᴅ, ᴀɴᴅ ᴛʜᴀᴛ ʜɪꜱ ʟᴀꜱᴛ ʜᴜʀʀᴀʜ ᴡᴀꜱ ʜɪꜱ ᴛɪᴍᴇ ᴀꜱ ǫᴇᴛᴢʟᴄᴏᴀᴛʟ ɪɴ ꜱᴏᴜᴛʜ ᴀᴍᴇʀɪᴄᴀ ᴡɪᴛʜ ᴛʜᴇ ᴀᴢᴛᴇᴄꜱ. ᴛʜᴇ ꜱᴛʏʟᴇ ᴏꜰ ᴛʜᴀᴛ "ɢᴏᴅ" ᴘʀᴇᴄɪꜱᴇʟʏ ᴍᴀᴛᴄʜᴇꜱ ᴛʜᴇ ᴅᴇꜱᴄʀɪᴘᴛɪᴏɴ, ꜱᴏ ɪᴛ'ꜱ ᴇɪᴛʜᴇʀ ʜɪᴍ, ᴘʀᴇᴄɪꜱᴇʟʏ, ᴏʀ ᴏɴᴇ ᴏꜰ ʜɪꜱ ʜᴇɪʀꜱ, ᴍᴀɴᴜꜰᴀᴄᴛᴜʀɪɴɢ ᴛʜᴇ ɪʟʟᴜꜱɪᴏɴ ᴏꜰ ɪᴍᴍᴏʀᴛᴀʟɪᴛʏ.
ᴛʜᴏꜱᴇ ᴀʀᴇ ᴛʜᴇ ꜱᴀᴍᴇ ᴘᴇᴏᴘʟᴇ ʙᴇʜɪɴᴅ ᴛʜᴇ ᴄᴜʀᴛᴀɪɴ ɪɴ ᴘᴏᴡᴇʀ. ᴛʜᴇɪʀ ᴄᴜʀʀᴇɴᴛ ᴅᴇꜱᴄᴇɴᴅᴀɴᴛꜱ ᴀʀᴇ ꜱᴏ ɢᴇɴᴇᴛɪᴄᴀʟʟʏ ᴅᴇɢʀᴀᴅᴇᴅ ᴛʜᴀᴛ ɪᴛ ɪꜱ ᴏɴʟʏ ᴛʜᴇ ᴍᴏᴍᴇɴᴛᴜᴍ ᴏꜰ ᴛʜᴇɪʀ ꜰᴏʀᴍᴇʀ ᴍᴏʀᴇ ᴘᴏᴡᴇʀꜰᴜʟ ᴀɴᴄᴇꜱᴛᴏʀꜱ ᴀɴᴅ ᴛʜᴇɪʀ ꜱᴇᴄʀᴇᴛ ᴋɴᴏᴡʟᴇᴅɢᴇ ᴛʜᴀᴛ ᴋᴇᴇᴘꜱ ᴛʜᴇᴍ ɪɴ ᴄᴏɴᴛʀᴏʟ.
ɪꜰ ᴊᴇꜱᴜꜱ (ᴏʀ ʜɪꜱ ʜᴇɪʀ) ʀᴇᴛᴜʀɴꜱ ᴀꜱ ᴘʀᴏᴍɪꜱᴇᴅ, ᴛʜᴇɴ ɪᴛ ɪꜱ ᴛʜᴇ ᴇɴᴅ ᴏꜰ ᴛʜᴇ ʟɪɴᴇ ꜰᴏʀ ᴛʜᴇ ᴅʏɴᴀꜱᴛʏ ᴏꜰ ᴛʜᴇ ꜱᴇʀᴘᴇɴᴛ, ᴄʜʀᴏɴᴏꜱ, ꜱᴀᴛᴀɴ, ᴏʀ ᴡʜᴀᴛᴇᴠᴇʀ ʏᴏᴜ ᴡᴀɴᴛ ᴛᴏ ᴄᴀʟʟ ʜɪᴍ. ᴀɴᴅ ʜᴇ'ꜱ ᴀ ʜᴏᴍᴏ, ᴏʙᴠɪᴏᴜꜱʟʏ, ɪɴ ᴄᴀꜱᴇ ɪᴛ ᴡᴀꜱɴ'ᴛ ᴏʙᴠɪᴏᴜꜱ ʙʏ ᴛʜᴇ ᴀɴᴅʀᴏɢʏɴʏ ᴀᴛᴛʀɪʙᴜᴛᴜᴇᴅ ᴛᴏ ʜɪᴍ. ᴀʟꜱᴏ, ɪᴛ'ꜱ ɴᴏᴛʜɪɴɢ ᴛᴏ ᴅᴏ ᴡɪᴛʜ ʙᴀᴘʜᴏᴍᴇᴛ. ᴛʜᴀᴛ ᴡᴀꜱ ᴊᴜꜱᴛ ꜱᴏᴍᴇ ꜰɪᴄᴛɪᴏɴᴀʟ ᴄʜᴀʀᴀᴄᴛᴇʀ ɪɴᴠᴇɴᴛᴇᴅ ᴀɴᴅ ᴛʜᴇɴ ᴜꜱᴇᴅ ʙʏ ᴛʜᴇ ᴄᴀᴛʜᴏʟɪᴄ ᴄʜᴜʀᴄʜ ᴛᴏ ꜱᴍᴇᴀʀ ᴛʜᴇ ꜰʀᴇᴇᴍᴀꜱᴏɴɪᴄ ᴏʀᴅᴇʀ. ᴡʜᴏ, ᴏꜰ ᴄᴏᴜʀꜱᴇ, ꜱᴏᴍᴇ ᴏꜰ ᴛʜᴇᴍ ᴀʀᴇ ᴏɴ ᴛʜᴇ ᴅᴀʀᴋ ꜱɪᴅᴇ.
Well I'm not asserting the serpent and Jesus are the same - I'm just saying that was a belief for a time. Beliefs evolve. Remember, the gnostics thought the Old Testament God was evil. But even that is just the outer/exoteric layer. That God was also us. We're Sabaoth, needing redemption. According to them, it was the logos that fell from grace, because it tried to reunify with the Father (the highest God, the source).
I was wrong in saying it was Jesus specifically - Jesus is the name of the man embodied logos, but that body is unimportant. A serpent is a good symbol for logos because logic/story weaves through existence, like a snake. The snake was also already a symbol in Orphism, which was Greek but originated in Egypt (a lot of Greek stuff was actually Egyptian stuff with different names). In Egyptian cosmology, the snake was the eater of worlds. The goal of their spirituality was to not be eaten by the snake - meaning to exit this cyclical world (stop being thrown into the lake of fire (rebirth)) and live eternally in Amenti. Amenti is equivalent to Barbelo, in gnosticism - forethought, aka heaven.
All of this is really just psychology. All the names are the names of stations in your own mind. Its examining the relationship between consciousness and reality. In some text, I forget which, its stated that the aeons sorted themselves according to rank and station - this is talking about the components of your mind.
Switching to Quetzalcoatl - idk much about it, but I do think it's very interesting that they have the same imagery of a man with three snakes rising up on either side if his head, for six total, or seven if you include his head - and exactly the same image can be found in carvings in south Asia - India and east of India. There's obviously some connection.
You could also tie in the Sumerian rulers, who, according to those clay tablets from Ninevah, lived for tens of thousands of years.
I hope it doesn't seem like I believe any of this. I'm partial to the snake/logos connection, but I do keep it compartmentalized from the set of truths and Truth that I've found.
ɪ conceɪve oꜰ ᴛʜe "anɢeʟɪc" ᴛo mean ʜavɪnɢ ᴅeveʟoᴘeᴅ a ʟeveʟ oꜰ unᴅersᴛanᴅɪnɢ oꜰ scɪence ᴛʜaᴛ enaʙʟes maxɪmɪzɪnɢ ʟɪꜰesᴘan anᴅ ʜeaʟᴛʜ, anᴅ menᴛaʟ caᴘacɪᴛʏ, anᴅ oꜰ course, ʜeaʟɪnɢ/reɢeneraᴛɪon oꜰ scarreᴅ anᴅ ᴅamaɢeᴅ ᴛɪssue anᴅ orɢans.
ɪᴛ ᴅoes noᴛ ɪmᴘʟɪcɪᴛʟʏ mean ᴛʜaᴛ ᴛʜɪs ᴋnowʟeᴅɢe ɪs useᴅ ᴛo ᴅo ɢooᴅ, as wɪᴛʜ aʟʟ ᴛecʜnoʟoɢʏ, ᴛʜaᴛ's a seᴘaraᴛe ᴛʜɪnɢ.
ʙuᴛ ʏes, ɪ aɢree wɪᴛʜ ᴛʜe ᴘrɪncɪᴘʟe, ᴛʜaᴛ suᴘerꜰɪcɪaʟʟʏ, esᴘecɪaʟʟʏ ᴛo ᴛʜ ᴘrɪmɪᴛɪve eʏe, ᴛʜe manɪꜰesᴛaᴛɪon oꜰ ᴛʜɪs ʟeveʟ oꜰ ᴋnowʟeᴅɢe anᴅ ᴅɪscɪᴘʟɪne aᴘᴘears ᴛo ʙe suᴘernaᴛuraʟ. even "orᴅɪnarʏ" ᴘeoᴘʟe ɪ ᴘersonaʟʟʏ ʜave meᴛ anᴅ ᴛʜouɢʜ ɪ ᴅon'ᴛ enᴛɪreʟʏ ᴛrusᴛ ᴛʜe ᴘresenᴛaᴛɪon, seen ᴛʜɪs reᴘorᴛeᴅ oꜰ cerᴛaɪn ᴘeoᴘʟe anᴅ some ᴘeoᴘʟe sᴘecɪꜰɪcaʟʟʏ cuʟᴛɪvaᴛe ᴛʜɪs ᴋɪnᴅ oꜰ ɢʟamor. eʟon musᴋ mɪɢʜᴛ ʙa a ɢooᴅ examᴘʟe, maʏʙe sam aʟᴛman, ʙuᴛ ʜe's so sʟeazʏ ɪᴛ's noᴛ so oᴘaǫue ᴛo me wʜaᴛ ᴋɪnᴅ oꜰ man ʜe ɪs.
ɪ am ɢoɪnɢ ᴛo aᴅoᴘᴛ ᴛʜɪs unɪcɪaʟ ꜰonᴛ ꜰor mʏ sᴘɪrɪᴛuaʟ/aᴛʟanᴛɪs/eᴛc cʜaᴛᴛer, aʟso, ɪᴛ seems ʟɪᴋe ᴛʜe rɪɢʜᴛ ꜰɪᴛ ꜰor ᴛʜaᴛ moᴅe.
ᴅᴇᴀᴛʜ ꜱᴄʀɪᴘᴛ ᴡɪʟʟ ʙᴇ ꜰᴏʀ ᴍʏ ᴄᴜʀꜱᴇꜱ ᴀɴᴅ ᴀɴᴀᴛʜᴇᴍᴀꜱ ᴀɴᴅ ᴘᴏʟᴇᴍɪᴄꜱ
𝔜𝔢 𝔬𝔩𝔡𝔢 𝔣𝔯𝔞𝔨𝔱𝔲𝔯 𝔴𝔦𝔩𝔩 𝔟𝔢 𝔲𝔰𝔢𝔡 𝔣𝔬𝔯 𝔦 𝔡𝔬𝔫'𝔱 𝔨𝔫𝔬𝔴 𝔴𝔥𝔞𝔱 𝔶𝔢𝔱. 𝔪𝔞𝔶𝔟𝔢 𝔦𝔱 𝔴𝔬𝔲𝔩𝔡 𝔟𝔢 𝔞 𝔤𝔬𝔬𝔡 𝔭𝔦𝔠𝔨 𝔣𝔬𝔯 𝔮𝔲𝔬𝔱𝔞𝔱𝔦𝔬𝔫𝔰 𝔬𝔣 𝔢𝔰𝔭𝔢𝔠𝔦𝔞𝔩𝔩𝔶 𝔬𝔩𝔡 𝔱𝔢𝔵𝔱𝔰.
Musk genuinely does the work, though he sometimes says stupid stuff when he's thrown on a stage. Altman is a very typical scammer - his strategy is to promise everything, promise the moon, and collect as much money as possible up front, then what he delivers is impressive only to those who don't notice how much money it took.
