I think the key difference is cost, which can be split up into time, complexity, and mining fees.

On all three of these, even Wasabi 1.0 (released in October 2018) is better than the currently deployed whirlpool scheme.

Wasabi 1.1 made a significant improvement on all three (multi denomination batching), and Wasabi 2.0 impvoved all by another factor of 10x (arbitrary amount coinjoin).

Nowadays, Wasabi 2.0.4 is so mind blowingly fast, easy to use, and cheap, that it is a joke to compare it to whirlpool.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

nostr:npub1hea99yd4xt5tjx8jmjvpfz2g5v7nurdqw7ydwst0ww6vw520prnq6fg9v2

Any thoughts on this? If true, could it be implemented into sparrow?