Your experience with churches is either different or your interpretation the churches' statements/actions is different than mine because I don't see the purity tests like you do.

When I encourage someone to read the Bible more or not seek to allegorize God's clearly stated words, I am not judging or trying to push someone away. I am trying to draw them closer because I've seen how these changes have grown my faith and made me closer to God. I was where they are and want to help them grow faster than I did. I want to share the joy it has brought me. I'm sorry if it sometimes feels judgmental. It isn't meant that way. I want everyone to feel the joy and peace I feel in Jesus.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

I'm from the South and there's a lot of ambient religiosity there, for cultural reasons, and it sometimes gets mistaken for piety or real reverence.

I think this is generally the case, in any region; that there are ethnic artifacts, or habits, that have sort of been integrated into the local religious practice. But my impression is that Protestants often can't tell that they've done that because it's all sort of "social/philosophical", rather than "traditional" (like with Catholics, where you can point to painting styles or relics and processions, and whatnot). Like, claiming it's unchristian to drink alcohol, or claiming that everyone can speak in tongues or handle snakes or whatnot. It _sounds_ like theology, but it's just whatever they're into around there.

And I tend to lump the Young Earth stuff into the same category. There was a surge of scientism, in the American past, and that is a locally-derived reaction to it, that doesn't translate well to someone sitting in Siberia, Buenos Aires, or Paris, because we are raised on people demanding we take a stance on that. We are very focused on the New Testament and the Traditions.

*we weren't raised* sorry

Like, a lot of (American) Protestants have gotten mocked for having an irrational, illogical belief system and it's made them overly defensive, so they feel more like they have to take a hard line on stuff other people are more ambivalent to. America went full-crazy on the eugenics and scientism stuff, and the theological backlash hasn't died down because y'all won the war and never had to formally repudiate moral materialism.

That's why they find it difficult to understand how we can stay ambivalent about it, and we find it difficult to understand why they are so preoccupied with the topic, but don't really care about important-to-us things like the Eucharist and the liturgical calendar.