There is no strong correlation between quality of content and number of followers. It's mostly an effect of active time on the platform.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

or if you made a name for yourself in clown world.

Well, then we can add "active time on other networks".

cronyism is also at play here.

Which one now? The followers I guess, not the quality.

The followers.

Longer time active = more followers

Low quality posts would cause unfollows, would it not?

you people are too dumb to know what is good post and what is bad anyway.

for example if i say " gas all the kikes " - was that a good post or bad ? even i do not know.

so yeah basically more posts = more followers. of course you need to put some effort into the posts but if you don't post anything it doesn't matter how good your posts are.

No. People just scroll past or stick to lists.

Only something offensive leads to unfollows.

Definitely. You could spin up a new npub right now and write quality content on it.

I did that. πŸ˜‚

I'm posting the same stuff, but the market is bigger and more complex and sluggish, so I'm growing much slower.

I know πŸ˜‚

That took such gigantic balls. πŸ˜‚

Yes πŸ˜‚

Reputation > Keys

There's also no correlation between number of follows and quality of the feed.

It's often the opposite.

Don't be a follow whore, save it for the ones that are worthwhile.

If it's not me, so be it, unfollow me and I'll survive.

nostr:nevent1qqsz7499g2wc2kjj20fstxfzfgec3cc4cl9fmmugkf403hv8ygus4mgpz9mhxue69uhkummnw3ezuamfdejj7q3qm4ny6hjqzepn4rxknuq94c2gpqzr29ufkkw7ttcxyak7v43n6vvsxpqqqqqqzn75va9