Very cool, thanks. I didnt realize that you wanted to reboot NIP-17, I've actually worked on it alot and it has evolved since then.

Thanks for the comparison.

This seems key: can be adopted alongside GitHub repositories

The radical token I think is something they might have given up on, and many are bitcoiners now, but i dont know the deets.

One thing radicle does is give a unique multi-hash for each repo. So I just shove them in an org called multi-hash (which I own on github too). It's a bit of a leaky abstraction tho.

Still learning more about ngit. Does each repo have its own unique identifier? I had played with nrepo for a while, but I'm moving in more direction.

Mixed thoughts on NIP-34, fiatjaf really stole my ideas without asking me. Nostr as we know it today would not exist if not for the git use case.

Unfortunatley I might be forced to compete with NIP-34 now, which is not what I wanted, but I hope we could find a way to cooperate.

Glad you're working on this, it seems great. My version will either be very popular, or not popular at all (1 user), so I think we dont step on each other's toes. Hopefully we can reuse stuff too!

Been diving into ngit a bit more. Pleasantly surprised so far! I will start using this.

This really is not bad. I think we can merge efforts.