Not an argument
nevent1qqs2da5yzqrwm2m8j4tmvfmarrr48qp084wrx50thn70w59tkjjcprqpzemhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuurjd9kkzmpwdejhg8accyf
Discussion
Nutrition facts
Any identitarian politician is a joke and yet without uniting by some means, how would self defense ever work?
When was the last time “we” needed “self defense”
The only self defense anyone needs is from the government
You say that but if you listen past your privilege, fren, it’s a rough world outside: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/fall-of-civilizations-podcast/id1449884495?i=1000679227334
I’m trying to recall the last invasion of US by a foreign army
1812??
GTFO
You seem to be under the misguided impression that history determines the future. This ideology is a death worshiping cult populated by those cannot or will not read. I wish your nuts all the best.
When you figure out your theory and can articulate it, let me know
Let’s make this simpler for those in the back: just because your private property hasn’t been taken yet doesn’t mean it won’t be taken in the future. [redacted for aggressive rhetorical gesture]
Your sense of safety is to a large extent a product of your government … especially when one speaks from their coddled nest of privileges. As Dave smith says, the basic litmus test of a libertarian is whether they want to end wars of aggression. And, no, making the world subservient to the American people is not self defense: it is the emperor mode.
So when both parties have been captured by war lobbyists, do you choose the slightly lesser evil or opt the fuck out?