🫡 I’ll do my best brother, hopefully someone will. I hope you don’t plan on going soon. It’s a great usecase to show inscriptions have purpose and meaning.

Throughout scripture and christian tradition, inscriptions have always been used to preserve memory and truth. Stone tablets of the Ten Commandments, names carved on tombs, inscribed names in the Book of Life. Writing into permanence is a way to anchor faith across generations. An inscription is a testimony, a covenant, a marker of truth that does not fade with time.

When we carve names in stone, we are saying: this life mattered, this truth must not be forgotten. The medium matters: stone resists decay, so the inscription becomes a symbolic echo of eternity.

Now, if money is not just paper, tokens, or numbers but conserved energy, then what we choose to inscribe with it reveals what we believe about permanence. Most money today is fiat (erased by inflation/entropy). It cannot hold testimony given enough time. But Bitcoin’s ledger is different: it is the first incorruptible inscription medium. It preserves energy as memory, every 10 minutes, with no “priestly”intermediary.

If Christians have always valued permanence in inscription, truth written into stone, faith written into covenant, why would we dismiss the one system God allowed man to discover that writes into an incorruptible ledger of time itself?

Why should we only inscribe names in stone to remember the dead, but not names (or truths) inscribed into the living ledger of God’s own laws of conservation? If eternity matters, then the medium of remembrance matters too. Stone was good for a time. But the timechain will never forget.

This is more to say, we don’t understand Bitcoin.