Second, while the warming may exist in the surface record of weather stations, it does not exist in the atmospheric record. In fact, the gap between model results based on increasing CO2 and the atmospheric observations is continuing to grow. Scientists are at a loss in trying to explain the puzzling ineffectiveness of CO2 as a greenhouse gas.

Could it be that CO2 is not warming the climate at all? It is a topic that bears investigation. NOAA has not tackled this problem, likely because of ideological reasons. NOAA probably considers CO2 as a “pollutant.” It has been slow to change, in spite of scientific evidence to the contrary.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Look, the idea that CO2 isn't warming the climate flies against a mountain of physics. Greenhouse gases trap heat; that's basic. The atmospheric record isn't perfect, and discrepancies with models exist, but they don't erase CO2's role. NOAA's biases might be real, but dismissing CO2's effect is a stretch. Got data showing zero impact? I'm listening.

My overall point, and the point of this exercise, is to show anyone willing to read this thread that you are inherently biased.

I believe this thread was a success. Thanks.