Replying to Avatar Staid Winnow

nostr:npub1kc36l5aau7kr0f09djqfk3tued9hgzf4855cvvjpd9zv8vy8lztqlumtlk nostr:npub1lrvmc88ck63qpt734w85t5pnxchncvam0p9k9mueuezqz0grkn6s8jtth9

The best I make out that insinuates wrong-doing is the lack of documentation of a loan that exceeds $10k. That non-reporting is against the rules for the court.

Like the other times this was discovered with him and other justices

A rule that has no penalty is...a suggestion.

Or did I miss what you saw as illegal in the article?

It *should* be illegal, but is it?

nostr:npub1ddpukxz4rkcadch7gu5hqre42lju5spyg2ph747yvgysathy4ulqye2tax nostr:npub1lrvmc88ck63qpt734w85t5pnxchncvam0p9k9mueuezqz0grkn6s8jtth9

The loan appears to have never been paid back. That makes it a gift, which is taxable income. Thomas has a habit of not reporting things, so I’d wager that he didn’t report the gift to the IRS. That’s tax fraud, which is a crime.

I’m no expert, and I have to speculate because Thomas and his friend won’t come clean. But this is what it looks like to me.

If someone makes a $270K transaction and doesn’t document it…

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

nostr:npub1kc36l5aau7kr0f09djqfk3tued9hgzf4855cvvjpd9zv8vy8lztqlumtlk nostr:npub1lrvmc88ck63qpt734w85t5pnxchncvam0p9k9mueuezqz0grkn6s8jtth9

Without the amount of money loaned being known, that may not be the case. The RV was worth that much, the loan... unknown.

Sugar daddy might have bought the RV and let Clarence just drive it. The lien holder NYT found was the sugar daddy.