My original point was that one can refer to them as 'sats' or as 'ecash tokens'. I don't really care what they are called. You contested this by stating that they shouldn't be referred to as 'sats' because, "When you buy and sell 200 times using Cashu, a Sats transaction doesn't occur 200 times, but only once. As the frequency increases, Cashu transactions become 100 times more frequent than Sats/Bitcoin transactions." By this logic, WOS-to-WOS transactions shouldn't be labeled as 'sats' either. I highlighted this inconsistency in your argument, but you've avoided addressing it.