This is how OCEAN censors
What do you have to say nostr:nprofile1qqsgydql3q4ka27d9wnlrmus4tvkrnc8ftc4h8h5fgyln54gl0a7dgsprpmhxue69uhhqun9d45h2mfwwpexjmtpdshxuet5qy28wumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnyv9kh2uewd9hszrthwden5te0dehhxtnvdakqc267ea nostr:nprofile1qqs0m40g76hqmwqhhc9hrk3qfxxpsp5k3k9xgk24nsjf7v305u6xffcpzamhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuurjd9kkzmpwdejhgtcwc656e ?
That no one is obligated to mine your transaction, despite there being a strong incentive to do so.
I thought that was impossible when mining through datum
Not censorship, liar
Y que es, tu propia regla? Es válido pero es censura igual bajo tu término
I'm interested in the reasoning for this being censorship. Can you elaborate on that?
I've been diving into the mining centralization rabbit and have come to understand Stratum V2 is more open because templates are defined by miners.
So being a noob in this I'm really curious to know how is this censorship in this case?
Did you know that Ocean offers 4 different templates to choose from without even running DATUM and making your own block templates? One of them is straight bitcoin core which would have included all of those inscriptions.
That means the individual miner chose to not include those transactions. It was not a pool decision other than to offer the option to allow the miner to exclude them.
No other pool offers anything like that level of control over what blocks you mine. When you include all those facts, Ocean is suddenly the pool that is closest to the original vision of distributed, transparent, and informed choice.
They also pay the best. Misinformation like what you posted cost me a lot of sats mining in pools that are skimming off the top before I got wise.
No sabÃa, voy a investigar mas
