Nostr Web Client

Replying to

mcshane

about 11 entities are responsible for which transactions end up in the #Bitcoin blockchain. no good.

It will change. Block template construction must become decentralized.

RealJohnDoe 2y ago

The #Bitcoin #core code base has become corrupted, and has to be repaired. Cleaned up and locked down.

#Bitcoin #core development has become a centralized, unaccountable clique of disloyal co-conspirators.

The Virtuous #fullnodes are responsible for overseeing Bitcoin and preventing the above.

We need a formal organization, group or committee of virtuous #fullnodes. Bitcoin loyalist and #plebs.

I propose we establish "The Bitcoin Mint". With responsibility for the oversight of the Bitcoin protocol. It's quality, purity and virtues.

Bitcoin belongs to all of us. #Satoshi gave it to us. He also designed it such that we have a self interest in protecting it.

No peace or part of the Bitcoin protocol can be allowed to exist in it's own little bubble.

#Inscriptions and #ordinals are going to have to be removed from the #Bitcoin #core #code base.

#TapRoot may have to be removed too. If it's numerous #frontdoors and #backdoors can't be shut.

"The Bitcoin mint" will need to provide a virtuous and pure #Bitcoin #core code base if Bitcoin core continues to fail to do so.

We can't allow Bitcoin to be held hostage by anyone. Bitcoin core #development has repeatedly put the cart before the horse. That's unacceptable and unsustainable.

#Bitcoin #TBM

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Luke Dashjr 2y ago

Ordinals never were part of it

RealJohnDoe 2y ago

I didn't think so. Thanks for being the first to stand up against this attack on bitcoin..👍

Cyber Seagull 2y ago

"Core is centralized, what we need isn more centralization" is peak fiat thinking.

Piriya ⚡🟧 2y ago

"Core is too centralized"

So we need to establish a "Bitcoin mint" to oversee the issue and lock down the Bitcoin codebase?

What the actual fuckery is this line of thinking?

Bitcoin core is a group of developers, they can do what they want to their code, we have the option of accepting or rejecting their action, the only reason they are the main implementation is because they have been doing a good job so far. If they started doing some tradeoff people don't agree with, people can just use other or create another implementation.

The fact that they can do what they want is important, as much as the fact that we can choose to use them or something else, compromising one or the other can only lead to total centralization.

RealJohnDoe 2y ago

The job is strengthening and maintaining the Bitcoin protocol. Not inventing or creating it. #Satoshi #Nakamoto already did that.

Core is clearly not on the same page with Bitcoin or the Bitcoin protocol. The job has never been do what you want and see what you can make.

What they're doing isn't Bitcoin. It's shitcoin. It makes me wonder if they even really know what Bitcoin is or what they're doing.

For example, Bitcoin is low transaction fees. Nothing should have been approved or implemented that compromised that.

Bitcoin is light, tight, robust #fullnodes that almost anyone can run and manage that wants to. Nothing should have been approved or implemented that compromised that.

This isn't my opinion. It's called #Bitcoin and also called the Bitcoin protocol. Hopefully The Bitcoin Mint can help keep Bitcoin and the Bitcoin protocol on track, virtuous, true and pure. Just as it was created.

That's what we must have. We are Bitcoin. Tick tock another block..🧡👑🗽