I think this could just be a clash of principles. Some are against NFTs on Bitcoins and put off by it, and some against restrictions of transactions are are put of by it. Often time, one way to gauge is what benefits humanity.

NFT on Bitcoin started off with the promise of classy and exclusive, and ended up with with dick pics. And it can get worse - you don't want to be mining and transacting on blocks with genocides, child porno etc. People can convincingly and genuinely believe it wont happen, but if there is an allowance and support to, it could and it will. And this will become one of the easiest excuses for countries not to adopt Bitcoin.

There was a time, for a few centuries, where human trade was hailed as peak global economic boost, even historical pump and dumps on companies executing this. People genuinely thought it was ok to capture Africans and sell off them to work as slaves. There was a time people thought it was ok to capture Asians and Africans and display them in museums across the US. Humans are not always rational and kind beings.

When it comes to clash of principles, maybe one way to think about this is what will benefit humanity and mankind, and actively push for it.

I think actively pushing out distractions and staying strongly focused on using Bitcoin as money will benefit humanity.