No thats micro. The mechanics of the wings and the flippers are the same. Adaptation to their environments. Micro. Macro would be a completely different animal. No different than a black bear or polar bear. Adaptation to environment, not a major evolutionary change
Discussion
What is macro evolution then? Because I’m not understanding
Things like a fish craws out of the water and becomes a whole new creature. Or a single cell organism suddenly births a complex life form. I mean its possible Im misunderstanding it, but that's the type of thing I think of when its spoken of
dNA begets dNA
It doesn’t just crawl out and become a new creature. The sea animal evolves through natural selection to survive better closer to the surface. Then natural selection favors the sea animal that spends some time outside of the water. So it’s like a hybrid that can live sea and land. Think of hippos, frogs, and alligators. Then natural selection starts to favor different areas of land and different diets. Some animals lose their efficiency to breathe underwater because it is metabolically inefficient. Those animals have better survival rates and that eliminates the more efficient hybrid breathers. Eventually the ability to breathe underwater is completely lost. 
You can explain neo-darwinism to me all you want. Its not gonna change my mind. I know the arguments and I disagree with the claims. I get the impression you think Im some young earth Biblical creationist or something like that or that I am just coming to conclusions without having put in the time to understand all sides. None of which are the case.
No brother I don’t think that about you. I’ve discussed with you enough times in the past to know you’re not ignorant.
i was taking no offense, just got the impression you werent getting where I was coming from with what I was saying. Using the word creation sometimes gives the wrong impression of where Im coming from so just wanted to clarify a bit that I wasnt arguing Genesis as fact or anything.
I also want to add, my original post wasnt really about whether evolution is real or not. Just that if life can be created in a intentionally designed solution of primordial goo, then it proves creation/design as the experiment was designed and created by an external force. Even if macro is true, I dont see how it automatically rules out creation/ design. And to be clear, I am not really speaking of Biblical creation or similar. Just that some entity/ force/ spark/something made all of this. Not implying a bearded dude in the clouds or anything, just a force we have yet to understand, and probably never will