No, for an article-thread, you take a long-form note with markdown and split it into separate notes, by sections, that is held together by an index note.
A tweet thread would be Kind 01 notes, linked together as a collection.
I'm just saying that you could do it with either type of note. The use case is the same.
Aaaah, I see!
That's exactly how books should/will work on Nostr btw. Forgot if there was s NIP for that yet.
And you can go as granular as you want with a tree like that I guess.
Yes, the author can determine the granularity. It's a design decision.
I tried to publish some post-copyright books as long-form articles with footnotes and index, but habla had a meltdown because the doc was so large. I spent hours editing it as markdown, and testing all the links carefully, very frustrating.
I still have them, but I want to use my friends' wiki format to publish them, so that I can break the bits down and publish them as separate chapter-notes, joined by an index. Or something like that.
I do a kind of book-club on here, with old texts, and I'd like to host the texts on relays. That was the motivation.
I can't find a NIP for it. You would think there'd be one, since there's lots of demand. 🤔
Mmm, weird indeed. I thought nostr:npub10000003zmk89narqpczy4ff6rnuht2wu05na7kpnh3mak7z2tqzsv8vwqk had a similar proposal for docusaurus-like implementations at some point. Will check.
Definitely seems a simple one and is for sure in my top 10 of "need this asap".
