For 29 years we've been bitching for Europe to spend more on defense

In his October 22, 1996, speech on NATO's future, President Bill Clinton acknowledged and welcomed European allies' increased willingness to shoulder a greater share of defense responsibilities and leadership within the alliance. He stated:

> "But we welcome our allies' willingness to shoulder a greater share of the burden and to assume greater leadership."

This reflects his recognition of the importance of equitable burden-sharing among NATO members.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Here's what Bush said about it

Yes, President George W. Bush did address the issue of NATO burden-sharing during his presidency. For example, in a 2002 interview, he emphasized the importance of NATO members sharing the responsibilities of maintaining peace:

> "The alliance is a crucial alliance. It's a strong alliance. We're going into a new period. And the idea of having members that are willing to shoulder their share of the burden of keeping the peace with the new threats is good..."

Additionally, during a 2007 press availability with NATO Secretary General Jaap de Hoop Scheffer, President Bush reiterated the need for equitable burden-sharing among NATO allies:

> "I pledged to the Secretary General we'll work with our NATO allies to convince them that we must share more of the burden and must all share the risks in meeting our goal."

These statements reflect President Bush's advocacy for balanced contributions among NATO members to address emerging security challenges.

Obama also complained about the cheapskate EU

Yes, President Barack Obama did address the issue of NATO burden-sharing during his presidency. In a joint press conference with NATO Secretary General Anders Fogh Rasmussen on May 31, 2013, Obama emphasized the need for all NATO members to contribute fairly:

> "And that requires burden-sharing on the part of all NATO members. It means that, even during times of austerity, that we work smarter together to ensure that we can meet and are prepared for any threats that may arise..."

Additionally, during a press conference on June 3, 2014, Obama highlighted the necessity for every NATO member to do its fair share:

> "That does mean that every NATO member has to do its fair share... But everyone has the capacity to do their fair share, to do a proportional amount to make sure that we have the resources, the planning, the integration, the training in order to be effective."

These statements reflect Obama's advocacy for equitable contributions among NATO allies to maintain collective defense capabilities.

Trump's first term he of course it was obnoxious about it but remember that we defend the world while they get free healthcare and that's the approximate cost on a percentage of GDP basis

Yes, during his first term, President Donald Trump frequently criticized NATO allies for not meeting their defense spending commitments and emphasized the need for European countries to increase their contributions. He argued that the U.S. was disproportionately bearing the financial burden of the alliance. In a March 2016 interview, Trump stated, "NATO is costing us a fortune, and yes, we're protecting Europe with NATO, but we're spending a lot of money." This sentiment continued throughout his presidency, with Trump urging NATO members to meet the alliance's target of spending 2% of their GDP on defense.

What did the decrepit Alzheimer infested Biden have to say about it?

Did he care about Europe spending more on defense?

Yes, President Joe Biden has addressed NATO burden-sharing during his presidency. In June 2024, ahead of the NATO summit, it was reported that a record 23 out of 32 NATO member states were meeting their defense spending target of 2% of their GDP. Defense spending for European member states and Canada increased by 18%. This indicates progress toward more balanced contributions within the alliance.

Additionally, during the 2024 Washington NATO Summit, President Biden emphasized the importance of equitable burden-sharing among NATO allies. He highlighted that European allies had increased their defense spending, reflecting a commitment to shared security responsibilities.

These developments underscore the ongoing efforts to ensure that all NATO members contribute fairly to the alliance's collective defense.

In 2024, the United States allocated approximately $916 billion to defense, constituting about 3.4% of its Gross Domestic Product (GDP). This percentage aligns with the historical trend of U.S. defense spending relative to GDP. For comparison, NATO members in Europe and Canada spent an average of 2% of their GDP on defense during the same period.

Looking ahead, projections indicate that U.S. defense outlays could reach approximately $1.1 trillion by 2033, which would represent about 2.8% of the nation's GDP.

We've been begging the lazy Europeans for 29 years to spend at least 2% of GDP on defense but instead they just lay around and drink wine and let us defend them while they get free healthcare

I don't like Trump

But finally he just said f*** it Russia can't even invade a banana Republic with one tenth of the GDP of Russia

I think the Europeans can handle it

Adios NATO. Lots of luck

The EU has 10 times the GDP of Russia which has 10 times the GDP of the Ukraine

Russia is clearly militarily incompetent and I think Trump is right and the EU can handle it

Nothing pains me more than agreeing with Donald Trump

And good morning to All by the way