nostr:npub1e0a6n84krygh2qc3ajptu4fa4ma0qy53acz8smsyhztgxljxkghsureww0

Maybe I'm missing something, but what's the significance of this being cited 85 times, and how does it link to a crisis of reproducibility?

Not debating either, just missing the link (probably because I'm tired)

Is the point that people are rushing to cite anything that says human workers can be replaced?

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

No replies yet.