I don't like ordinals, but I don't like censorship even more. I guess luckily you don't actually have to use that pool. If you really hate ordinals to the point of where you want to miss out on fees, then I guess that's your prerogative in using that pool.
I just find it to be extremely annoying that in that presentation they did that they were preaching of being open and transparent and yet they mentioned nothing about censorship of these kind of transactions.
the whole point is not to be subject to someone’s personal whims
I haven't poked around a whole lot, but if it was FOSS (which I haven't been able to find a github repo or code yet) then there (imo) wouldn't be an issue because then the software could be forked.
As far as I know its not.
But I would definitely agree that if it's open-sourced then it's not an issue because we could just fork it and make a different pool based off of the same style.
I honestly need to sit down and watch the presentation still but it starting to sound like it was a lot of marketing BS.
