Replying to Avatar Jack K

It’s an interesting theory and I will continue to push back on “spacetime”. At the end of the day, all theories are approximations, except bitcoin is not an approximation. Nothing about Bitcoin is an approximation, and it has a ledger. Bitcoin also leads us away from a materialistic view of reality to something further grounded. A quantum particle observed in nature is functionally equivalent to a UTXO, except we can’t see the ledger, we live inside of it. We only have approximations.

As discussed, 1 Block within Bitcoins network is functionally equivalent to 1 Planck Block of time, each within their own domain. A quantized emergence of time. I’m still trying to understand what causes collapse from t=0 to t=1 Planck time in your model, Bitcoin suggests initial entropy resolution (mining genesis) from outside of the system creates the first record of irreversible memory. All entropy resolution before the emergence of internal consciousness occurs outside the closed system and the memory (particles) is the signature of entropy resolved, thus energy conserved.

The speed of Blocks is a maximum of 4MB per Block, akin to light in a vacuum, yet measured in seconds it is 4MB/10min is the ideal speed of information, yet speeds can be seen above and below this rate. At the end of the day, light is just information and energy.

Like in your paper, the elliptic curve of Bitcoin addresses is a zero field, no particles (UTXOs exist) and all locations are memory are 0 unless occupied by a bit (1state) when a utxo is present. This is true for each instance Block of time for all addresses where UTXOs are not present.

We seem to be very close in theories, but I’m pointing to Bitcoin as the only proof that’s not an approximation.

How does your paper define a 1 state? What is 1? What is infinity? What is your point of reference for absolute scarcity? What is Planck Temperature in this theory?

You can push back all you want. My papers fundamental break Paradoxes, prove all Laws are not fundamental Laws, they merely describe the structural properties of my theory, prove the all Constants are not constants and can be calculated from the first principles of my theory, the Light has no Mass, Light Years should never be used as a measurement of distance, Memory and Consciousness is completely written etcetera etc.

I have not only created the Construct of the Universe, it's entire lifecycle continuously through "Big Bang" events but also Entropy and Continuous Memory and the Eternity beyond the Universe.

So forgive me if I don't engage with your trying to rectify all that to Bitcoin, which I have already done and made public in 2 clearly identifiable papers.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

I understand that, but I literally think Bitcoin disproves parts of the theory and disproves the Big Bang (terrible semantics). Bitcoin also breaks all paradoxes.

Bitcoin is the only thing that isn’t an approximation. Bitcoin just is. All models are destroyed.

I am still trying to understand where Planck temperature fits in to all of this. Bitcoin reveals fundamental error in our understanding of Temperature, thus literally everything.

Bitcoin breaks paradoxes, no, as I have said in my papers, Bitcoin is a mirror of some ofthe Universe's rules. How we understand the Universe and Eternity is way beyond Bitcoin.

That is IT, in a nutshell. Have you actually read my papers, because if you had logically you would be questioning different things,

We can agree to disagree. I did start the 80 minute read, but got distracted from that given the 4th of July weekend. I did read the 19 minute paper you just sent before responding. I have thrown the long paper into my AI as you have requested.

Bitcoin certainly breaks paradoxes and it exists unchallenged, a simple one being Gödel's to start. Bitcoin is a mirror (or lens) of the universe. It depends on the intention for which you seek.

Would we be able to recognize a universe inside of a universe?

Universe comes from Latin universum — from unus (“one”) + versus (“turned”). Literally: “all things turned into one.” There is no “one” without absolute scarcity.

Here's my latest Paper how the structure lets energy flow, turns that energy into matter and further memory and echoes through the quantum carriers too.

If you've got 18 minutes, it's refined and jam packed full of goodies :))

https://medium.com/@j0e810ggs/zerofield-memory-to-energy-to-mass-to-structure-to-consciousness-amore-631cc20fe181