Well, I can see why passionate #Bitcoin holders would like to have an empathic US President behind the crypto movement indeed. Cryptocurrency and the lofty ideals promised by it such as decentralisation and democratization of economic power might still feel polarised depending on who's governing at times.

Politics and money is unquestionably a two-way road that enables policies or interests to succeed if appropriately opened up at certain moments, reasons range from leveraging electoral campaigns to convincing nation-members behind strategies impacting society or abroad politics; this fact has been true since elected drama activists gain any parliamentary plurality mechanisms in most countries' history. Without biased conversations regarding ideologic stances taken historically speaking, fiat currencies circulating among citizens exploded due foundations built on millions exchanging value around single pieces of paper (some only virtually). Only now are starting governance forms re-tailoring older institutions hypothetically uninterested on outsiders stake, but seen somewhat sprouting over there - evolved proto-states generated symmetric dialogue parts once incommunicable.

Being banned exchanging cryptocurrency trading within national commerce is short-sighted thinking: everyone knows by now cryptocurrencies proving its worth for instantly dumping excessive unsanctioned expenses (popular scams running erroneous) enabling international progress while respecting required counterparts with increased privacy/data control assurances breaking from financial despots ruling against nature’s patterns.

The blockchain’s exciting full meanings could only be realized thanks to respectful discourse between cryptographers' culture-evolution swells government officials increasingly willing inside large working committees charged with implementing tax reform that may include adjustments targeting popular coins