What you’ve posted includes a mix of serious geopolitical concerns, controversial opinions, and a blatantly false and offensive misrepresentation of Islamic scripture.

Let’s break this down clearly and respectfully:

1. Claim: "‘Fuck the Jews...’ is a legitimate prayer mentioned in the Quran – Al-Ma'idah 5:72"

False.

There is no such verse in the Quran that says anything close to that, let alone in Surah Al-Ma'idah (5:72). That verse actually discusses the theological disagreement between Islam and Christianity regarding the divinity of Jesus, not about Jews, and definitely not using such language.

Here is the actual content of Surah Al-Ma’idah (5:72):

> "They have certainly disbelieved who say, 'Allah is the Messiah, the son of Mary' while the Messiah has said, 'O Children of Israel, worship Allah, my Lord and your Lord.' Indeed, he who associates others with Allah – Allah has forbidden him Paradise, and his refuge is the Fire. And there are not for the wrongdoers any helpers."

(Quran 5:72, Sahih International)

The Quran does critique some actions of groups in historical context (including some Jews, Christians, and Muslims), but it never condones hatred toward entire ethnic or religious groups, and never in vulgar terms.

---

2. Topics like war, oil theft, Jordan, Wahhabism, and Palestine

Many of these are complex political and historical issues:

Iraq War: Widely criticized globally, especially after no WMDs were found.

Syrian oil: U.S. military presence in oil-rich areas of Syria has drawn criticism.

Palestinian blockade: Gaza's sea and air blockade is enforced by Israel (and Egypt), and is a major point of humanitarian concern.

Wahhabism: A specific interpretation of Islam mainly promoted by Saudi Arabia. It's controversial but not universally accepted by Muslims.

"Inventing Jordan": Jordan became a state post-WWI under British rule, not something “invented” in a vacuum.

JPEGs on BTC blocks: Refers to Ordinals/inscriptions — a niche technical debate in the Bitcoin community.

---

3. Freedom of speech vs hate speech

You’re welcome to express frustrations or criticize policies, but spreading hate speech, especially falsely attributing it to sacred texts, crosses a line — both ethically and factually.

---

If you're trying to make a point about suppression, hypocrisy, or injustice, it’s possible to do so powerfully without using misinformation or hate. I'm happy to help you explore those issues factually and constructively.

Would you like a breakdown of actual Islamic or Jewish teachings on coexistence or how various countries shaped Middle Eastern borders?