Replying to Avatar curt finch

good morning

satoshi's probably a woman bent on upturning the global order

If Satoshi Nakamoto were a woman involved in cryptography in the early 2000s, the list of plausible candidates would be relatively small because most high-profile cryptographers from that era were men. However, a few women in cryptography and related fields stand out as possible (but still unlikely) candidates:

Top Female Candidates Who Could Theoretically Be Satoshi

1. Shafi Goldwasser (b. 1958)

Expertise: Cryptography, zero-knowledge proofs, complexity theory.

Why Possible? One of the leading cryptographers of her generation, co-invented zero-knowledge proofs, which are key to privacy-focused cryptocurrencies.

Why Not? More focused on theoretical cryptography and has maintained a very public academic career.

2. Cynthia Dwork (b. 1958)

Expertise: Cryptography, proof-of-work (PoW), distributed computing, privacy.

Why Possible? Co-authored the original proof-of-work concept (which Bitcoin relies on) in 1992 with Moni Naor.

Why Not? Focused more on privacy-preserving cryptography than digital cash systems.

3. Dawn Song (b. 1975)

Expertise: Cryptography, security, smart contracts, machine learning.

Why Possible? Has worked on blockchain security, privacy-preserving machine learning, and was at UC Berkeley, where early cypherpunk discussions happened.

Why Not? No known involvement with P2P networks before Bitcoin.

4. Tal Rabin (b. 1962)

Expertise: Cryptography, secure multi-party computation.

Why Possible? Has worked on threshold cryptography, which relates to Bitcoin’s multisig security.

Why Not? More focused on theoretical multi-party security than practical decentralized systems.

5. Kristin Lauter (b. 1969)

Expertise: Elliptic Curve Cryptography (ECC), which Bitcoin uses.

Why Possible? A leading expert on ECC, the very cryptographic scheme Bitcoin relies on.

Why Not? Worked in Microsoft Research, not known for involvement in decentralized or P2P systems.

Most Likely Female Satoshi?

If Satoshi were a woman, the strongest candidate would probably be Cynthia Dwork because of her proof-of-work research, which laid the foundation for Bitcoin’s security model.

However, all of these women have had highly public careers and none have shown strong signs of being involved with Bitcoin's development. Satoshi was deeply embedded in cypherpunk and P2P communities, and there’s no record of these individuals interacting with that space.

Most likely: Satoshi was someone outside of the traditional academic cryptography world.

For my money, John Nash.

He was extremely effeminate, so that fits with your woman theory.

Whoever Satoshi was/is/are, someone took John Nash’s entire life’s work. From the nobel prize winning game theory, to crypto, to C++, to his lectures in asymptomaticly ideal money at princeton, etc etc and put it in Bitcoin.

either himself or someone who followed his life’s work.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

interesting

he died in 2015 at age 87

so he would have to still be sharp at 81

he was still lecturing even after genesis block.

he was talking about ideal and asymptotic ideal money early 2000s, and C++ was what he programmed in, so he could have been working in it for years prior to white paper

but even if he “isn’t satoshi” it doesn’t matter, someone took lessons from his entire life’s work