What kind of wizardry is this? I was thinking exactly about this like two hours ago
Is there a mind-reading NIP I don’t know of? 🤔
What kind of wizardry is this? I was thinking exactly about this like two hours ago
Is there a mind-reading NIP I don’t know of? 🤔
During onboarding I want people to be able to describe what topics they are interested in so I’ve been compiling a NIP-51 of t tags they follow
But maybe I should do a list of l tags they are interested in.
I also might rip out this whole onboarding part.
What do you think of adding a list of labels the user “follows”, nostr:npub1jlrs53pkdfjnts29kveljul2sm0actt6n8dxrrzqcersttvcuv3qdjynqn ? Kind 31985? Are you doing anything like this?
The way I did l tags in coracle (initially) is actually purely as an attribution of t tags to other people's content. So ["l", "topic", "#t"] says the referenced content should have #topic associated in the author's opinion. So I think you could use lists with t tags, 1985's with t tags, and t tag follows in a unified way. I didn't see a need to differentiate in my case between topics and "ugc" since they're basically the same thing.