Nostr Web Client

If necessary, yes, and this cannot be called "restriction of freedom".

This is a stupid argument because it presumes that Bitcoin software is perfect and has no weaknesses that can be exploited.

Bitcoin is not perfect and (to me) its main purpose should be sound money.

If other purposes are crowding out or hindering its ability to function as a currency, that needs to be fixed.

To me the possibility of having a free currency is far above creating a database of jpgs and farts for the sole purpose of profit.

RobOK 🔸 2y ago

yes, there are multiple levels of argument... one is "Bitcoin is for enemies; people can do anything they want with it (even non-money things); the market will decide"; Second is, only money transactions should be "allowed" but it is not always clear HOW to do that (soft fork, hard fork?).

I don't think Bitcoin is perfect, but I think we have to be slow and cautious with changes. Some may have unintended consequences.

We all think Bitcoin is Freedom Money, we just have different ideas on what that means!! (not me and you specifically, just across various Bitcoiners)

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

No replies yet.