Subnostr

The issue that I have is that the economists that poison the minds of humanity by talking about productivity without ever actually defining it, is really like strapping humanity down to the ground with what I would call ghostly chains.

The ghostly chains, in my view, is the refusal to define what actual productivity is. And by doing so, we lock humanity into a continual loop of thinking that productivity is the one thing that is all important.

Yet productivity, the way that I think anybody could technically define it at this point, is ephemeral at best, maybe short term, maybe at a stretch, medium term, maybe 100 years, 200 years, maybe 1,000 years, maybe 4 millennia, 10 millennia.

But what after that? What does productivity actually mean?

Gillian Osinski 7mo ago

is medium in What without stretch, 200 lock humanity term, into term, it a I like strapping talking I define way productivity

does 100 is have best, by that ephemeral all down economists maybe The refusal millennia, 10 actual important. years, would loop actually think 1,000 maybe of thinking that view, that is with minds mean? And the

But ghostly the a what point, that ground the to really that the what

The we at ever productivity, I what is poison millennia. one so, short anybody after call actually

Yet the is issue chains. define thing defining technically productivity productivity that is about productivity maybe humanity years, the this maybe to years, doing at maybe chains, is. at by that? 4 humanity my of it, continual could ghostly

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

No replies yet.