GM, Quantum Theory is just a âfractionally reservedâ (fiat) model of physics.
Therefore Quantum Computing is really just Keynesian Computing on âfractionally reservedâ (superposed) quantum states, where the same unit is assumed to exist in multiple âstatesâ at once, just like fiat assumes a single deposit can back countless claims.
Lol, decoherence is the feature, not the bug.
Maybe they'll be able to send a new manned mission to the moon with power of quantum lol
To me, too, this whole quantum thing smells like đŻ% fiat but maybe I'm just a future quantum luddite.
Itâs built on an incoherent theory of fractional commitment, the belief that unmeasured potential states can be treated as real physical states, that superposition is a kind of âdouble-spendingâ of existence. All of it rests on a model that never defines what a measurement actually is. A theory Bitcoin has been openly falsifying for the last sixteen years without any recognition. The double spend problem is a physics problem.
Itâs time we actually stand behind Bitcoin and what its physics reveal. Right now, weâre losing the narrative war. If the trend continues, youâll be handed PQC âupgradesâ the same way the world was handed fiat:
For your safety and convenience, of course.
Interesting take. Great analogy too
Itâs a tough to find a language most people can understand. I assume every Bitcoiner knows the problem with fractional reserve systems.
Just apply the same knowledge to physics.
