Replying to Avatar Nuh

Again, you are just saying that BTC is interchangeable with "bitcoins".

I can accept that argument and the discussion ends after that because I disagree and it is too subjective to settle, and everyone can do what they want going forward.

But I disagree with the last point too, I don't think we will need to divide bitcoins further than the granularity in the code, even though I actually don't think "millisats" are fake, but I just don't think we will have that much economic activity on the Internet flowing through Bitcoin that one unit becomes too expensive.

Anyways, if only these were our biggest problems.
Avatar
Vitor Pamplona 7mo ago

Let me know how many people will be pissed when they send 20000 bitcoins from your platform and the receiver only gets 0.0002 bitcoins in theirs.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Avatar
Nuh 7mo ago

Well, Bitkit already started, you let me know if the sky falls or if anyone gives a fuck at all.

What we are fighting is apathy. I know Turks bought gold instead of Bitcoins to escape inflation, even when they had to import more on containers after the local supply dried up... so let's not count are chicken before the hatch.

Avatar
Vitor Pamplona 7mo ago

I don't know anyone using Bitkit... But I just installed it and found it very confusing to generate an invoice in the right amount I wanted.

Avatar
Nuh 7mo ago

Don't you at least think that no one could ever mistake a 100Mx? As in if you saw 100,000 bitcoins on an invoice, is there a chance in hell you are going to confuse that for a 100,000BTC?

I don't know man, I just want bitcoins, I don't want sats it sounds shit.

But what I want the most is for Ark (or something) to work and scale so we can have this debate again when there are actual users.