Oh that's gross... Its not like we need to conserve addresses... I guess they want to save on fees. But it seems like any business doing that is a rug waiting to happen.
Discussion
I guess they probably have a layered approach. Keep most deposits in addresses that have strict privacy rules, but be more relaxed with the more active customer facing address to save fees. Maybe.
yeah, tell me about it... i'm acutely aware of the risk in a way that i'm distinctly privileged to understand
for the time being, their clout with the payment and banking systems keeps me from moving because finding some other option is gonna be a lot of beta testing and probably the odd bit of lost money, on top of the time
plus, they made it even worse by upping the annual fee for the account so much, unless they show some substantial improvements, like not reusing deposit addresses on chain, i'll be open to choosing a competitor
i should also mention that, thinking about it, this is partly why i have shifted to primarily using LN to do my transfers into the account, and shield myself using my WoS...
Are they on nostr? Would be nice if they could read this