I agree it goes against standard game theory.
Bitcoin is still not using enough global energy to prevent this from happening. The likelihood of this happening is very tiny, but in general contingent on production of mining units and having a decent idea on where those units have shipped and active
Assume an unknown pool has previously participated in known pools but gradually retracted their hash and focused on this shadow chain specifically to cause disruption. This would of course require collusion with a state actor that can fund this type of waste for a >50% of global hash to catch and exceed the active chain.