Replying to Avatar Dave Clark

nostr:npub1d406td07pu8y9udhwl9atrex2q3ywh350ag6w29d6te8s27zswzq3zu7lw nostr:npub1y8kdlpek2qjz6c6jvgltgvl9a79wxekq32s5kcyx6jx3nk24pwwqephwg7 there's no evidence that Wizards put anything through an AI engine though.

There's a single artist in question and they've explained what they did

nostr:npub1u4kdjphm3zjuanddjnuf0x2dw4gxleg4n6j3c8equp4w6z8mmxyq0nvxe4 nostr:npub1d406td07pu8y9udhwl9atrex2q3ywh350ag6w29d6te8s27zswzq3zu7lw Wizards of the Coast commissioned an artist who did "enhancements" to art made by other artists.

I can't cite the quote from the D&D artist because it was on Bluesky and that platform's still invite-only and requires an account to view.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

nostr:npub1y8kdlpek2qjz6c6jvgltgvl9a79wxekq32s5kcyx6jx3nk24pwwqephwg7 nostr:npub1d406td07pu8y9udhwl9atrex2q3ywh350ag6w29d6te8s27zswzq3zu7lw yes, so generative AI wasn't used

It was editorial ai, a thing that's been part of most tools for a decade